Imagine a Wikipedia constantly patrolled by academics. Can you do it? Well, someone has, and they've made it look like this.
Scholarpedia, a peer-reviewed version of wikipedia (whatever the hell that means... isn't wikipedia, in a sense, peer-reviewed?). Currently, the Linguistics section seems to be written by Mark Arnoff and "peer-reviewed" by his longtime collaborator Wendy Sandler, both of whom I have respect for but hardly what I would call a balanced peer-review process.
Where are all the linguists at? It's not like we have anything better to do...
(I remembered to use the 'linguistics' tag for the first time on this blog... lame)
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(69)
-
▼
September
(17)
- Imagine a Wikipedia constantly patrolled by academ...
- Things that put a smile on my face
- Rerun
- Scientific reporting
- podcast is a noun which can be verbed, etc.
- Being an avid hater of tailgaters and a huge fan o...
- Japanese innovation will never cease to impress me
- It doesn't sound nearly as ridiculous in text
- There's no question that there are quite a lot of ...
- comedian insults geek
- why I feel sorry for some of you today.
- Apply directly to the forehead
- Step one: get your own financing.
- Death in Linguistics
- Almost settled. Almost.
- Scientists and their interesting lives
- IRAQ!
-
▼
September
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment