Usually, when you see a symbiotic relationship between birds and large mammals, it is a mutually beneficial one, such as the case with the oxpecker and large grazing mammals in africa.
Not this time.
That is scary. I would not want to be a whale who's getting eaten alive by seagulls...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(71)
-
►
May
(11)
- You have to be rich to be poor
- Komodo Dragons are still cool, just less so
- English is English, except when it's not
- Seriously: Jonathan Coulton
- Zombies and the absurd
- Scientists, they can be right, then wrong, then ri...
- Art
- Gender stereotypes are funny
- Judge Antonin Scalia needs to pay attention to tha...
- euler and the pitfalls of foreign surname pronunci...
- Use headphones to get the fullest effect
-
►
April
(12)
- When politics, religion, and health crises clash
- Paper Hearts
- How we (liguists) roll.
- Como hacer un Bebe
- Hidden Camera's are one of humanity's greatest and...
- A whole new take on Zipf's Law
- more youtube genius
- Stop motion excellence, from the people that broug...
- new york screamers
- They were this really funny comedy troupe
- Shenanigans
- God protects us, don't you know
-
►
May
(11)
2 comments:
yes, that is very scary. wow. (though I'm not sure how this is symbiotic?)
Symbiosis: Biology. A close, prolonged association between two or more different organisms of different species that may, but does not necessarily, benefit each member.
Is it close? about as close as the distance between a bird's beak and a whale's blubber when the bird is eating the whale's blubber. Is it prolonged? How long does it take for a bunch of sea birds to make that many holes on a whale's back?
Ok, so symbiosis might be a stretch, but is there a better term? short term parasitic symbiosis maybe?
Post a Comment