Global, human-induced climate change

Of course, the main problem with his argument is that we can choose column A, but we might already be too late, in which case we'll still get the horrible outcome of row2colB. But if we add column C, which is a contingency plan for when the earth turns to shit (such as building hydroponic food towers, elimination of all WMDs, cure for AIDS, increase to stem cell research funding) then we can get benefits either way while diminishing the negative outcomes of the worst case scenario.


Interesting Argument About Global Warming - Watch more free videos

OSX and Windows (Linux too)

It turns out that the difference is just not that great. Spend some time on one, then spend some time on the other. There are benefits and drawbacks to them both. My experience with Linux is minimal but I believe the same can be said about that OS.

It's what's true for forms of government, or cultures, or pizza restaurants. For every pro you can find, someone else will perceive some con.

No one has got it right. There's no utopia just as there's no perfect operating system.
You just have to find the thing that's right for you. I never really considered myself a relativist, but maybe I should.